Sunday, July 30, 2006
Better Trading Blog has moved!
Friday, July 28, 2006
Dummy day trading 28-Jul-2006
Thursday, July 27, 2006
Re: Dummy day trading 27-Jul-2006
Dummy day trading 27-Jul-2006
Wednesday, July 26, 2006
Dummy day trading 26-Jul-2006 II: Mini Dow
Dummy day trading 26-Jul-2006
Tuesday, July 25, 2006
RE: Dummy day trading 25-Jul-2006
Dummy day trading 25-Jul-2006
Monday, July 24, 2006
Change
TIMSCI 24-Jul-2006: Short Trade closed
Day trading watch list: 24-Jul-2006
Intraday Trend | MSCI Taiwan Index Futures | MSCI Singapore Index Futures |
Longer term | Down | Down |
Medium term | Down | Down |
Short term | Down | Down |
Recent High | 261.1 | 278.8 |
Recent Low | 256.4 | 276.8 |
Trading direction | Short | Short |
Saturday, July 22, 2006
Mini Dow & Gold futures: Short opportunities.
Friday, July 21, 2006
Day trading II : 21-Jul-2006
Intraday trend | Mini Dow | Gold Futures |
Intermediate term | Down | Up |
Short term | Down | Up |
Recent High | 11026 | 644.5 |
Recent Low | 10826 | 621.2 |
Chop! 21-Jul-2006
Day trading 21-Jul-2006
Intraday trend | MSCI Taiwan Index Futures | MSCI Singapore Index Futures |
Long term | Lateral | Lateral |
Intermediate term | Lateral | Lateral |
Short term | Lateral | Down |
Recent High | 267.8 | 284.4 |
Recent Low | 262.8 | 276.8 |
Thursday, July 20, 2006
No trade 20-Jul-2006
Day trading 20-Jul-2006
MSCI Taiwan Index Futures | MSCI Singapore Index Futures | |
Longer term | Down | Lateral |
Medium term | Up | Up |
Short term | Up | Up |
Recent High | 265.9 | 287.1 |
Recent Low | N.A | N.A |
Wednesday, July 19, 2006
Lecture notes series: Percent Risk Model
I developed a habit of writing down whatever I learnt, this helps me to 'burn' the information into my mind. I did this during my school time as well. I decided to jot down what I have read from books so far in Lecture Note series. As mentioned in my previous posting, I am following Percent Risk Model for my position sizing. Of course, this is not the only model available, it is just the approach I applied in my business. I have amended the approach to suit my style. Basically, I will define initial stop level base on chart. It can be support/resistance level, straight trend line, Count back line or swing high/low.
Definition:
RISK - the point at which I will get out of the position in order to preserve my capital. It is x percent of my trading equity, for example, I will risk not more than 2% of trading equity in any trade.
Percent Risk Model - Controlling my position size as a function of the risk.
For example, with account size of $50,000, 2% of $50,000 is $1000. That means in any trade, I shall not risk more than $1000 with this account size.If I got a Long signal for SIMSCI at 289 and I have figured out from chart, proper stop loss level is at 287.5. On one contract basis, this trade requires $300 risk. With maximum risk amount $1000 available to me, I will be able to buy ($1000/$300=3.33) 3 contracts in this trade.
I quote a portion of Dr. Van Tharp's explaination from his book
'Just how much risk should you accept per position with risk position sizing? Your overall risk using risk position sizing depends upon the size of the stops you've set to preserve your capital and the expectancy of the system you are trading.'
Here goes on the explaination :
'if you are trading other people's money, you probably should risk less than 1 percent per position. If you are trading your own money, your risk depends upon your own comfort level. Anything under 3 percent is probably fine, if you are risking over 3 percent, you are a "gun-slinger" and had better understand the risk you are taking for the reward you seek.'
He explained the relationshiop with system expectancy as well:
'if you have high expectancies in your system (i.e your reliability is above 50% and your reward to risk ratio is 3 or better), then you can probably risk a higher percentage of your equity fairly safely'.
The percent risk model is the first model that gives trader a legitimate way to make sure that a 1-R risk means the same for each item he is trading. The advantage of this model is, it allows both large and small accounts to grow steadily. It equalizes performance in the portfolio by the actual risk. On the other hand, the disadvantage will have you to reject some trades because they are too risk.
Trading Business plan 101
MSCI Taiwan Index Futures | MSCI Singapore Index Futures | |
Longer term | Down | Down |
Medium term | Lateral | Lateral |
Short term | Up | Up |
Recent High | ||
Recent Low |
Futures trading 19-Jul-2006
Tuesday, July 18, 2006
Market recap 18-Jul-2006
RE: TIMSCI 18-Jul-2006: Short trade closed
Futures trading 18-Jul-2006
Market recap 17-Jul-2006
RE: TIMSCI 17-Jul-2006: Short trade closed :chart
Monday, July 17, 2006
RE: TIMSCI 17-Jul-2006: Short trade closed
Day trading for 17-Jul-2006
Sunday, July 16, 2006
Article read: Master the Four Fears of Trading
Friday, July 14, 2006
TIMSCI 14-Jul-2006: Short trade closed: Chart
RE:MSCI Taiwan index futures (TIMSCI) 14-Jul-2006: Short trade closed
MSCI Taiwan index futures (TIMSCI) 14-Jul-2006: Short position
From 15-min chart, downtrend is established. MSCI Taiwan index futures (TIMSCI) is trading below 12-p, 21-p and 30-p EMA. I am only looking for SHORT position. Short position has been established at 263.8. I have removed all indicators but moving averages to keep myself clear and focus on price action and trend only. I do not expect this decision to deteriorate trading performance. Though I would say, I am still practising this approach. Intraday support area is found at area of 262.
I do not trade SIMSCI futures today, given first hour volume is only around 1,500 contracts traded.
Trading for 14-Jul-2006: Potential shorts
Traders who know themselves, who have common sense, who are disciplined, and who have the ability to keep it simple will do just fine. Remember that many people in the market are either uneducated or uninformed. And most of the few who are educated and informed waste their time building "scenarios" and end up defeating themselves by trying to outsmart the market. '
Trading should be simple. Really, it should be.